Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Cursor provides a more integrated AI coding IDE experience with access to multiple cutting-edge models, excelling for individual developers and students. Tabnine, on the other hand, prioritizes enterprise-grade security, privacy, and governance, making it the superior choice for organizations with strict compliance needs.
We've analyzed Cursor, Tabnine, and dozens of other tools to find the top performers for your specific needs.
Quick recommendations based on your use case
Cursor
Cursor's freemium model and direct AI coding assistance features are more beneficial for students learning and experimenting with AI in their development workflow.
Tabnine
Tabnine excels for enterprises due to its robust security, privacy features, and governance capabilities, ensuring code confidentiality and compliance.
Cursor
Cursor offers a more direct AI coding assistant experience with broad model integration, making it ideal for individual productivity boosts without immediate enterprise-level security concerns.
| Specification | Cursor | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| model | GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro, Grok | N/A |
| users | Millions of professional developers | Millions |
| security | Enterprise | Enterprise-grade security, SOC2, GDPR, IP protection, air-gapped deployment options |
| platforms | Web, Mac, Windows | VS Code, IntelliJ, Visual Studio, Eclipse, Android Studio, AppCode, CLion, GoLand, Neovim, PhpStorm, PyCharm, Rider, RubyMine, WebStorm |
| context window | N/A | N/A |
| gdpr compliant | N/A | ✓ Yes |
| soc2 compliant | N/A | ✓ Yes |
| enterprise features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| free tier allowance | N/A | N/A |